Bybit vs OKX for portfolio tracking

Bybit vs OKX for portfolio tracking | ChainsFlow

Both exchanges can contribute to a unified portfolio, but they expose different account models and credential shapes. This comparison describes the integration scope ChainsFlow actually supports rather than ranking the exchanges as investments.

Bybit: Unified Account

OKX: trading account

Trading and withdrawal permissions are not required for either connection

Supported account scope

Bybit is read from its Unified Account; OKX is read from its trading account. The distinction matters because assets held in unrelated products are not guaranteed to appear in either portfolio total.

Credential setup

Bybit uses API key and secret. OKX uses API key, secret and passphrase. In both cases the credential should be dedicated to portfolio tracking and limited to the minimum account-reading permissions.

Normalization differences

The Bybit connector handles unified wallet balance details, while the OKX connector handles available and frozen trading-account details. Both outputs become the same normalized asset-position model before aggregation.

Using both together

A multi-exchange view is most useful when connection identity remains visible. ChainsFlow keeps per-exchange synchronization state and does not hide a provider error behind an apparently complete combined total.