Bybit vs Kraken for portfolio tracking

Bybit vs Kraken for portfolio tracking | ChainsFlow

Both exchanges can contribute to a unified portfolio, but they expose different account models and credential shapes. This comparison describes the integration scope ChainsFlow actually supports rather than ranking the exchanges as investments.

Bybit: Unified Account

Kraken: account balance

Trading and withdrawal permissions are not required for either connection

Supported account scope

Bybit is read from its Unified Account; Kraken is read from its account balance. The distinction matters because assets held in unrelated products are not guaranteed to appear in either portfolio total.

Credential setup

Bybit uses API key and secret. Kraken uses API key and private key. In both cases the credential should be dedicated to portfolio tracking and limited to the minimum account-reading permissions.

Normalization differences

The Bybit connector handles unified wallet balance details, while the Kraken connector handles provider-specific asset codes and suffixes. Both outputs become the same normalized asset-position model before aggregation.

Using both together

A multi-exchange view is most useful when connection identity remains visible. ChainsFlow keeps per-exchange synchronization state and does not hide a provider error behind an apparently complete combined total.